Disaster recovery (DR) ensures business continuity by restoring technology systems after catastrophic events like cyberattacks, natural disasters, or infrastructure failures.
Why it matters
- Extended downtime can cost businesses $5,600+ per minute on average.
- Ransomware attacks make DR planning essential for every organization.
- Compliance frameworks require documented DR procedures.
- Customer expectations demand minimal service disruption.
Key metrics
- RTO (Recovery Time Objective): Maximum acceptable downtime—how fast must you recover?
- RPO (Recovery Point Objective): Maximum acceptable data loss—how recent must your backup be?
- MTTR (Mean Time to Recovery): Average actual recovery time.
- MTPD (Maximum Tolerable Period of Disruption): Point where business impact becomes unacceptable.
DR strategies (by RTO)
- Backup and restore (hours/days): Restore from backups to new infrastructure.
- Pilot light (minutes/hours): Core systems running in standby, scale up when needed.
- Warm standby (minutes): Scaled-down copy of production ready to scale up.
- Multi-site active/active (seconds): Traffic served from multiple locations simultaneously.
Essential components
- Data backup: Regular, tested backups with offsite/cloud copies.
- Documentation: Runbooks, contact lists, vendor information.
- Communication plan: How to notify stakeholders during outages.
- Alternative sites: Hot/warm/cold sites for operations.
- Testing: Regular DR drills to validate procedures.
Cloud DR considerations
- Multi-region deployments for resilience.
- Infrastructure as Code for rapid reconstruction.
- Database replication across availability zones.
- Automated failover mechanisms.
- Cost-benefit analysis of always-on standby vs. on-demand recovery.
Related Tools
Related Articles
View all articlesLocal LLM Benchmarks: 12 Findings From Consumer Hardware
NVIDIA publishes its inference wins on 8× DGX B300s. Almost nobody has those. So we ran the same ideas on a single consumer RTX 5060 Ti, a 2017 GTX 1080 Ti, and a CPU — and measured what actually happens. Here are all 12 experiments.
Read article →Ollama vs llama.cpp vs LM Studio: The Speed Tax, Measured
LM Studio, Ollama, and raw llama.cpp all run the same engine on the same GPU. We measured what the convenience layer costs: LM Studio adds 0.3%, Ollama adds 10%.
Read article →How Low Can You Quantize a GGUF Model Before Quality Breaks?
We swept Qwen2.5-Coder-7B from Q2 to Q8 on an RTX 5060 Ti. Output fidelity goes 21% at Q2, 57% at Q4, 80% at Q6 — the cliff is below Q4, and the sweet spot is Q4–Q5.
Read article →KV-Cache Quantization: The q4_0 Cliff Your Logs Won't Warn You About
We benchmarked f16 vs q8_0 vs q4_0 KV caches on the same model. q8_0 KV is nearly lossless (81.6% similar). q4_0 KV wrecks output quality (8.3%) while saving VRAM — and your throughput dashboard stays green the whole time.
Read article →