CWE-195: Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error

VariantDraft

The product uses a signed primitive and performs a cast to an unsigned primitive, which can produce an unexpected value if the value of the signed primitive can not be represented using an unsigned primitive.

View on MITRE
Back to CWE Lookup

Extended Description

It is dangerous to rely on implicit casts between signed and unsigned numbers because the result can take on an unexpected value and violate assumptions made by the program. Often, functions will return negative values to indicate a failure. When the result of a function is to be used as a size parameter, using these negative return values can have unexpected results. For example, if negative size values are passed to the standard memory copy or allocation functions they will be implicitly cast to a large unsigned value. This may lead to an exploitable buffer overflow or underflow condition.

Technical Details

Structure
Simple
Vulnerability Mapping
ALLOWED

Applicable To

Languages
CC++
Platforms

Source-backed guidance

Additional facts reviewed against primary or authoritative security sources.

Detect Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error with Automated Static Analysis

Documented detection approaches include Automated Static Analysis; recorded impacts include Unexpected State; observed examples include CVE-2025-27363, and CVE-2007-4268. Use these source-defined anchors to turn CWE-195 into implementation, review, and verification checks for the affected component.

CWE-195: Signed to Unsigned Conversion ErrorMITRE CWE

Prevent CWE-195 through an SSDF control plan

Use NIST SSDF practices to make prevention of CWE-195, Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error, an explicit development outcome. Translate the CWE definition into security requirements and design constraints, choose safer implementation patterns and toolchain checks, and define acceptance evidence before release. Feed every confirmed occurrence back into the requirements, design review, and coding rules so the same root cause is removed across the product rather than patched in one location.

NIST SP 800-218 Secure Software Development FrameworkNational Institute of Standards and Technology

Triage CWE-195 against known exploitation evidence

Use CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog to test whether a vulnerability mapped to CWE-195, Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error, has evidence of exploitation in the wild. Confirm the CVE-to-CWE root-cause mapping independently before attaching the example, then capture the affected product, required action, and remediation deadline. A missing KEV match is not evidence that the weakness is unexploited, and a KEV entry must not be generalized to every occurrence of this CWE.

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities CatalogCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency

Apply precise root-cause mapping to CWE-195

Apply MITRE's full root-cause mapping guidance when using CWE-195, Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error. Separate weakness language from attacker prerequisites and technical impact, check the entry's abstraction and vulnerability-mapping notes, and prefer the most specific Base or Variant supported by the evidence. Record the rejected alternatives and require an independent review before the mapping is used for remediation trends or program metrics.

CVE to CWE Root Cause Mapping GuidanceMITRE CWE

Validate CWE-195 with root-cause mapping checks

Apply MITRE's root-cause mapping quick tips to CWE-195, Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error. Confirm the finding describes the causal weakness rather than an impact or attack pattern, compare the abstraction and mapping notes with plausible alternatives, and have a second reviewer challenge the selection. Preserve the evidence and reasoning so recurring defects can be measured against one consistent identifier.

CVE to CWE Root Cause Mapping Quick TipsMITRE CWE

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CWE-195: Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error?+

CWE-195: Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error is a Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) entry maintained by MITRE. The product uses a signed primitive and performs a cast to an unsigned primitive, which can produce an unexpected value if the value of the signed primitive can not be represented using an unsigned primitive. It is dangerous to rely on implicit casts between signed and unsigned numbers because the result can take on an unexpected value and violate assumptions made by the program. Often, functions will return negative values to indicate a failure. When the result of a function is to be used as a size parameter, using these negative return values can have unexpected results. For example, if negative size values are passed to the standard memory copy or allocation functions they will be implicitly cast to a large unsigned value. This may lead to an exploitable buffer overflow or underflow condition.

What are the security consequences of Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error?+

If exploited, CWE-195 (Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error) it can compromise Integrity, leading to outcomes such as Unexpected State.

Which programming languages are affected by Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error?+

CWE-195 commonly affects C and C++. Note that weaknesses are often language-agnostic patterns, so secure coding practices apply broadly.

What are real-world examples of Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error?+

MITRE documents real CVEs mapped to CWE-195, including CVE-2025-27363 and CVE-2007-4268. You can look up the full details of each CVE, including CVSS scores and remediation guidance, on our CVE Lookup tool.

What is the difference between a CWE and a CVE?+

A CWE (Common Weakness Enumeration) like CWE-195 describes a category of software weakness — the underlying flaw type. A CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) identifies a specific, real-world vulnerability in a particular product. In short, a CWE is the kind of mistake, and a CVE is an instance of that mistake being found in software.

Learn More

Advertisement