CWE-262: Not Using Password Aging

BaseDraftExploit Likelihood: Low

The product does not have a mechanism in place for managing password aging.

View on MITRE
Back to CWE Lookup

Extended Description

Password aging (or password rotation) is a policy that forces users to change their passwords after a defined time period passes, such as every 30 or 90 days. Without mechanisms such as aging, users might not change their passwords in a timely manner. Note that while password aging was once considered an important security feature, it has since fallen out of favor by many, because it is not as effective against modern threats compared to other mechanisms such as slow hashes. In addition, forcing frequent changes can unintentionally encourage users to select less-secure passwords. However, password aging is still in use due to factors such as compliance requirements, e.g., Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS).

Technical Details

Structure
Simple
Vulnerability Mapping
ALLOWED

Applicable To

Languages
Not Language-Specific
Platforms

Source-backed guidance

Additional facts reviewed against primary or authoritative security sources.

Verify controls for CWE-262 with SSDF evidence

Use NIST SSDF verification and vulnerability-response practices to detect CWE-262, Not Using Password Aging, throughout the product lifecycle. Derive review questions, static or dynamic checks, and negative tests from the CWE's causal behavior; define the components and lifecycle stages each check covers; and retain findings with enough evidence to distinguish the root cause from symptoms and impacts. Track escapes and false negatives, then improve the verification plan after every confirmed occurrence.

NIST SP 800-218 Secure Software Development FrameworkNational Institute of Standards and Technology

Address Not Using Password Aging during Architecture and Design

MITRE associates mitigation with Architecture and Design, and Implementation; recorded impacts include Gain Privileges or Assume Identity; the entry maps to CAPEC-16, CAPEC-49, CAPEC-509, and CAPEC-55. Use these source-defined anchors to turn CWE-262 into implementation, review, and verification checks for the affected component.

CWE-262: Not Using Password AgingMITRE CWE

Triage CWE-262 against known exploitation evidence

Use CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog to test whether a vulnerability mapped to CWE-262, Not Using Password Aging, has evidence of exploitation in the wild. Confirm the CVE-to-CWE root-cause mapping independently before attaching the example, then capture the affected product, required action, and remediation deadline. A missing KEV match is not evidence that the weakness is unexploited, and a KEV entry must not be generalized to every occurrence of this CWE.

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities CatalogCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency

Apply precise root-cause mapping to CWE-262

Apply MITRE's full root-cause mapping guidance when using CWE-262, Not Using Password Aging. Separate weakness language from attacker prerequisites and technical impact, check the entry's abstraction and vulnerability-mapping notes, and prefer the most specific Base or Variant supported by the evidence. Record the rejected alternatives and require an independent review before the mapping is used for remediation trends or program metrics.

CVE to CWE Root Cause Mapping GuidanceMITRE CWE

Validate CWE-262 with root-cause mapping checks

Apply MITRE's root-cause mapping quick tips to CWE-262, Not Using Password Aging. Confirm the finding describes the causal weakness rather than an impact or attack pattern, compare the abstraction and mapping notes with plausible alternatives, and have a second reviewer challenge the selection. Preserve the evidence and reasoning so recurring defects can be measured against one consistent identifier.

CVE to CWE Root Cause Mapping Quick TipsMITRE CWE

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CWE-262: Not Using Password Aging?+

CWE-262: Not Using Password Aging is a Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) entry maintained by MITRE. The product does not have a mechanism in place for managing password aging. Password aging (or password rotation) is a policy that forces users to change their passwords after a defined time period passes, such as every 30 or 90 days. Without mechanisms such as aging, users might not change their passwords in a timely manner. Note that while password aging was once considered an important security feature, it has since fallen out of favor by many, because it is not as effective against modern threats compared to other mechanisms such as slow hashes. In addition, forcing frequent changes can unintentionally encourage users to select less-secure passwords. However, password aging is still in use due to factors such as compliance requirements, e.g., Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS).

What are the security consequences of Not Using Password Aging?+

If exploited, CWE-262 (Not Using Password Aging) it can compromise Access Control, leading to outcomes such as Gain Privileges or Assume Identity.

How do you prevent or mitigate Not Using Password Aging?+

Recommended mitigations for CWE-262 include: As part of a product's design, require users to change their passwords regularly and avoid reusing previous passwords. Developers might disable clipboard paste operations into password fields as a way to discourage users from pasting a password into a clipboard. However, this might encourage users to choose less-secure passwords that are easier to type, and it can reduce the usability of password managers [REF-1294].

Which programming languages are affected by Not Using Password Aging?+

CWE-262 commonly affects Not Language-Specific. Note that weaknesses are often language-agnostic patterns, so secure coding practices apply broadly.

What is the difference between a CWE and a CVE?+

A CWE (Common Weakness Enumeration) like CWE-262 describes a category of software weakness — the underlying flaw type. A CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) identifies a specific, real-world vulnerability in a particular product. In short, a CWE is the kind of mistake, and a CVE is an instance of that mistake being found in software.

Learn More

Advertisement