CWE-446: UI Discrepancy for Security Feature

ClassIncomplete

The user interface does not correctly enable or configure a security feature, but the interface provides feedback that causes the user to believe that the feature is in a secure state.

View on MITRE
Back to CWE Lookup

Extended Description

When the user interface does not properly reflect what the user asks of it, then it can lead the user into a false sense of security. For example, the user might check a box to enable a security option to enable encrypted communications, but the product does not actually enable the encryption. Alternately, the user might provide a "restrict ALL" access control rule, but the product only implements "restrict SOME".

Technical Details

Structure
Simple

Applicable To

Languages
Not Language-Specific
Platforms

Source-backed guidance

Additional facts reviewed against primary or authoritative security sources.

Verify controls for CWE-446 with SSDF evidence

Use NIST SSDF verification and vulnerability-response practices to detect CWE-446, UI Discrepancy for Security Feature, throughout the product lifecycle. Derive review questions, static or dynamic checks, and negative tests from the CWE's causal behavior; define the components and lifecycle stages each check covers; and retain findings with enough evidence to distinguish the root cause from symptoms and impacts. Track escapes and false negatives, then improve the verification plan after every confirmed occurrence.

NIST SP 800-218 Secure Software Development FrameworkNational Institute of Standards and Technology

Make elimination of CWE-446 a product outcome

Apply CISA's Secure by Design principle of taking ownership of customer security outcomes to CWE-446, UI Discrepancy for Security Feature. Put the weakness in the product threat model and security roadmap, fund class-level design and platform changes, prefer safe defaults and reusable guardrails, and publish measurable progress. Do not transfer the primary burden to customer configuration when the manufacturer can remove or contain the root cause in the product.

Shifting the Balance of Cybersecurity Risk: Secure by Design SoftwareCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency

Connect UI Discrepancy for Security Feature to documented attack evidence

Recorded impacts include Varies by Context; observed examples include CVE-1999-1446; related weaknesses include CWE-684. Use these source-defined anchors to turn CWE-446 into implementation, review, and verification checks for the affected component.

CWE-446: UI Discrepancy for Security FeatureMITRE CWE

Apply precise root-cause mapping to CWE-446

Apply MITRE's full root-cause mapping guidance when using CWE-446, UI Discrepancy for Security Feature. Separate weakness language from attacker prerequisites and technical impact, check the entry's abstraction and vulnerability-mapping notes, and prefer the most specific Base or Variant supported by the evidence. Record the rejected alternatives and require an independent review before the mapping is used for remediation trends or program metrics.

CVE to CWE Root Cause Mapping GuidanceMITRE CWE

Validate CWE-446 with root-cause mapping checks

Apply MITRE's root-cause mapping quick tips to CWE-446, UI Discrepancy for Security Feature. Confirm the finding describes the causal weakness rather than an impact or attack pattern, compare the abstraction and mapping notes with plausible alternatives, and have a second reviewer challenge the selection. Preserve the evidence and reasoning so recurring defects can be measured against one consistent identifier.

CVE to CWE Root Cause Mapping Quick TipsMITRE CWE

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CWE-446: UI Discrepancy for Security Feature?+

CWE-446: UI Discrepancy for Security Feature is a Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) entry maintained by MITRE. The user interface does not correctly enable or configure a security feature, but the interface provides feedback that causes the user to believe that the feature is in a secure state. When the user interface does not properly reflect what the user asks of it, then it can lead the user into a false sense of security. For example, the user might check a box to enable a security option to enable encrypted communications, but the product does not actually enable the encryption. Alternately, the user might provide a "restrict ALL" access control rule, but the product only implements "restrict SOME".

What are the security consequences of UI Discrepancy for Security Feature?+

If exploited, CWE-446 (UI Discrepancy for Security Feature) it can compromise Other, leading to outcomes such as Varies by Context.

Which programming languages are affected by UI Discrepancy for Security Feature?+

CWE-446 commonly affects Not Language-Specific. Note that weaknesses are often language-agnostic patterns, so secure coding practices apply broadly.

What are real-world examples of UI Discrepancy for Security Feature?+

MITRE documents real CVEs mapped to CWE-446, including CVE-1999-1446. You can look up the full details of each CVE, including CVSS scores and remediation guidance, on our CVE Lookup tool.

What is the difference between a CWE and a CVE?+

A CWE (Common Weakness Enumeration) like CWE-446 describes a category of software weakness — the underlying flaw type. A CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) identifies a specific, real-world vulnerability in a particular product. In short, a CWE is the kind of mistake, and a CVE is an instance of that mistake being found in software.

Learn More

Advertisement