CWE-667: Improper Locking

ClassDraft

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

View on MITRE
Back to CWE Lookup

Extended Description

Locking is a type of synchronization behavior that ensures that multiple independently-operating processes or threads do not interfere with each other when accessing the same resource. All processes/threads are expected to follow the same steps for locking. If these steps are not followed precisely - or if no locking is done at all - then another process/thread could modify the shared resource in a way that is not visible or predictable to the original process. This can lead to data or memory corruption, denial of service, etc.

Technical Details

Structure
Simple

Applicable To

Languages
Not Language-Specific
Platforms

Source-backed guidance

Additional facts reviewed against primary or authoritative security sources.

Verify controls for CWE-667 with SSDF evidence

Use NIST SSDF verification and vulnerability-response practices to detect CWE-667, Improper Locking, throughout the product lifecycle. Derive review questions, static or dynamic checks, and negative tests from the CWE's causal behavior; define the components and lifecycle stages each check covers; and retain findings with enough evidence to distinguish the root cause from symptoms and impacts. Track escapes and false negatives, then improve the verification plan after every confirmed occurrence.

NIST SP 800-218 Secure Software Development FrameworkNational Institute of Standards and Technology

Apply Libraries or Frameworks controls for Improper Locking

MITRE associates mitigation with Implementation; the listed strategies include Libraries or Frameworks; documented detection approaches include Automated Static Analysis. Use these source-defined anchors to turn CWE-667 into implementation, review, and verification checks for the affected component.

CWE-667: Improper LockingMITRE CWE

Triage CWE-667 against known exploitation evidence

Use CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog to test whether a vulnerability mapped to CWE-667, Improper Locking, has evidence of exploitation in the wild. Confirm the CVE-to-CWE root-cause mapping independently before attaching the example, then capture the affected product, required action, and remediation deadline. A missing KEV match is not evidence that the weakness is unexploited, and a KEV entry must not be generalized to every occurrence of this CWE.

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities CatalogCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency

Apply precise root-cause mapping to CWE-667

Apply MITRE's full root-cause mapping guidance when using CWE-667, Improper Locking. Separate weakness language from attacker prerequisites and technical impact, check the entry's abstraction and vulnerability-mapping notes, and prefer the most specific Base or Variant supported by the evidence. Record the rejected alternatives and require an independent review before the mapping is used for remediation trends or program metrics.

CVE to CWE Root Cause Mapping GuidanceMITRE CWE

Validate CWE-667 with root-cause mapping checks

Apply MITRE's root-cause mapping quick tips to CWE-667, Improper Locking. Confirm the finding describes the causal weakness rather than an impact or attack pattern, compare the abstraction and mapping notes with plausible alternatives, and have a second reviewer challenge the selection. Preserve the evidence and reasoning so recurring defects can be measured against one consistent identifier.

CVE to CWE Root Cause Mapping Quick TipsMITRE CWE

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CWE-667: Improper Locking?+

CWE-667: Improper Locking is a Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) entry maintained by MITRE. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors. Locking is a type of synchronization behavior that ensures that multiple independently-operating processes or threads do not interfere with each other when accessing the same resource. All processes/threads are expected to follow the same steps for locking. If these steps are not followed precisely - or if no locking is done at all - then another process/thread could modify the shared resource in a way that is not visible or predictable to the original process. This can lead to data or memory corruption, denial of service, etc.

What are the security consequences of Improper Locking?+

If exploited, CWE-667 (Improper Locking) it can compromise Availability, leading to outcomes such as DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU).

How do you prevent or mitigate Improper Locking?+

Recommended mitigations for CWE-667 include: Use industry standard APIs to implement locking mechanism.

Which programming languages are affected by Improper Locking?+

CWE-667 commonly affects Not Language-Specific. Note that weaknesses are often language-agnostic patterns, so secure coding practices apply broadly.

What are real-world examples of Improper Locking?+

MITRE documents real CVEs mapped to CWE-667, including CVE-2021-1782, CVE-2009-0935, CVE-2010-4210, CVE-2008-4302 and CVE-2009-1243. You can look up the full details of each CVE, including CVSS scores and remediation guidance, on our CVE Lookup tool.

What is the difference between a CWE and a CVE?+

A CWE (Common Weakness Enumeration) like CWE-667 describes a category of software weakness — the underlying flaw type. A CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) identifies a specific, real-world vulnerability in a particular product. In short, a CWE is the kind of mistake, and a CVE is an instance of that mistake being found in software.

Learn More

Advertisement