CWE-708: Incorrect Ownership Assignment

BaseIncomplete

The product assigns an owner to a resource, but the owner is outside of the intended control sphere.

View on MITRE
Back to CWE Lookup

Extended Description

This may allow the resource to be manipulated by actors outside of the intended control sphere.

Technical Details

Structure
Simple
Vulnerability Mapping
ALLOWED

Applicable To

Languages
Not Language-Specific
Platforms

Source-backed guidance

Additional facts reviewed against primary or authoritative security sources.

Verify controls for CWE-708 with SSDF evidence

Use NIST SSDF verification and vulnerability-response practices to detect CWE-708, Incorrect Ownership Assignment, throughout the product lifecycle. Derive review questions, static or dynamic checks, and negative tests from the CWE's causal behavior; define the components and lifecycle stages each check covers; and retain findings with enough evidence to distinguish the root cause from symptoms and impacts. Track escapes and false negatives, then improve the verification plan after every confirmed occurrence.

NIST SP 800-218 Secure Software Development Framework — National Institute of Standards and Technology

Address Incorrect Ownership Assignment during Policy

MITRE associates mitigation with Policy; documented detection approaches include Automated Analysis; recorded impacts include Read Application Data, and Modify Application Data. Use these source-defined anchors to turn CWE-708 into implementation, review, and verification checks for the affected component.

CWE-708: Incorrect Ownership Assignment — MITRE CWE

Triage CWE-708 against known exploitation evidence

Use CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog to test whether a vulnerability mapped to CWE-708, Incorrect Ownership Assignment, has evidence of exploitation in the wild. Confirm the CVE-to-CWE root-cause mapping independently before attaching the example, then capture the affected product, required action, and remediation deadline. A missing KEV match is not evidence that the weakness is unexploited, and a KEV entry must not be generalized to every occurrence of this CWE.

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog — Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency

Apply precise root-cause mapping to CWE-708

Apply MITRE's full root-cause mapping guidance when using CWE-708, Incorrect Ownership Assignment. Separate weakness language from attacker prerequisites and technical impact, check the entry's abstraction and vulnerability-mapping notes, and prefer the most specific Base or Variant supported by the evidence. Record the rejected alternatives and require an independent review before the mapping is used for remediation trends or program metrics.

CVE to CWE Root Cause Mapping Guidance — MITRE CWE

Validate CWE-708 with root-cause mapping checks

Apply MITRE's root-cause mapping quick tips to CWE-708, Incorrect Ownership Assignment. Confirm the finding describes the causal weakness rather than an impact or attack pattern, compare the abstraction and mapping notes with plausible alternatives, and have a second reviewer challenge the selection. Preserve the evidence and reasoning so recurring defects can be measured against one consistent identifier.

CVE to CWE Root Cause Mapping Quick Tips — MITRE CWE

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CWE-708: Incorrect Ownership Assignment?+

CWE-708: Incorrect Ownership Assignment is a Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) entry maintained by MITRE. The product assigns an owner to a resource, but the owner is outside of the intended control sphere. This may allow the resource to be manipulated by actors outside of the intended control sphere.

What are the security consequences of Incorrect Ownership Assignment?+

If exploited, CWE-708 (Incorrect Ownership Assignment) it can compromise Confidentiality and Integrity, leading to outcomes such as Read Application Data and Modify Application Data.

How do you prevent or mitigate Incorrect Ownership Assignment?+

Recommended mitigations for CWE-708 include: Periodically review the privileges and their owners.

How is Incorrect Ownership Assignment detected?+

CWE-708 can be detected using Automated Analysis. Combining automated tooling with manual review typically yields the best coverage.

Which programming languages are affected by Incorrect Ownership Assignment?+

CWE-708 commonly affects Not Language-Specific. Note that weaknesses are often language-agnostic patterns, so secure coding practices apply broadly.

What are real-world examples of Incorrect Ownership Assignment?+

MITRE documents real CVEs mapped to CWE-708, including CVE-2024-43199, CVE-2007-5101, CVE-2007-4238, CVE-2007-1716 and CVE-2005-3148. You can look up the full details of each CVE, including CVSS scores and remediation guidance, on our CVE Lookup tool.

What is the difference between a CWE and a CVE?+

A CWE (Common Weakness Enumeration) like CWE-708 describes a category of software weakness — the underlying flaw type. A CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) identifies a specific, real-world vulnerability in a particular product. In short, a CWE is the kind of mistake, and a CVE is an instance of that mistake being found in software.

Learn More

Find Related CVEs

Search for vulnerabilities that exploit CWE-708

CVE vs CWE: What's the Difference?

Understanding vulnerabilities vs weaknesses

Understanding CVSS Scoring

How vulnerability severity is measured

View Full MITRE Entry

Complete technical details and references

Advertisement