The Android application uses an implicit intent for transmitting sensitive data to other applications.
View on MITRESince an implicit intent does not specify a particular application to receive the data, any application can process the intent by using an Intent Filter for that intent. This can allow untrusted applications to obtain sensitive data. There are two variations on the standard broadcast intent, ordered and sticky. Ordered broadcast intents are delivered to a series of registered receivers in order of priority as declared by the Receivers. A malicious receiver can give itself a high priority and cause a denial of service by stopping the broadcast from propagating further down the chain. There is also the possibility of malicious data modification, as a receiver may also alter the data within the Intent before passing it on to the next receiver. The downstream components have no way of asserting that the data has not been altered earlier in the chain. Sticky broadcast intents remain accessible after the initial broadcast. An old sticky intent will be broadcast again to any new receivers that register for it in the future, greatly increasing the chances of information exposure over time. Also, sticky broadcasts cannot be protected by permissions that may apply to other kinds of intents. In addition, any broadcast intent may include a URI that references data that the receiving component does not normally have the privileges to access. The sender of the intent can include special privileges that grant the receiver read or write access to the specific URI included in the intent. A malicious receiver that intercepts this intent will also gain those privileges and be able to read or write the resource at the specified URI.
Other applications, possibly untrusted, can read the data that is offered through the Intent.
The application may handle responses from untrusted applications on the device, which could cause it to perform unexpected or unauthorized actions.
If the application only requires communication with its own components, then the destination is always known, and an explicit intent could be used.
No detection method information available for this CWE.
This application wants to create a user account in several trusted applications using one broadcast intent:
This application assumes only the trusted applications will be listening for the action. A malicious application can register for this action and intercept the user's login information, as below:
Intent intent = new Intent();intent.setAction("com.example.CreateUser");intent.putExtra("Username", uname_string);intent.putExtra("Password", pw_string);sendBroadcast(intent);This application wants to create a user account in several trusted applications using one broadcast intent:
This application assumes only the trusted applications will be listening for the action. A malicious application can register for this action and intercept the user's login information, as below:
IntentFilter filter = new IntentFilter("com.example.CreateUser");MyReceiver receiver = new MyReceiver();registerReceiver(receiver, filter);This application interfaces with a web service that requires a separate user login. It creates a sticky intent, so that future trusted applications that also use the web service will know who the current user is:
Sticky broadcasts can be read by any application at any time, and so should never contain sensitive information such as a username.
Intent intent = new Intent();intent.setAction("com.example.service.UserExists");intent.putExtra("Username", uname_string);sendStickyBroadcast(intent);This application interfaces with a web service that requires a separate user login. It creates a sticky intent, so that future trusted applications that also use the web service will know who the current user is:
Sticky broadcasts can be read by any application at any time, and so should never contain sensitive information such as a username.
IntentFilter filter = new IntentFilter("com.example.service.UserExists");MyReceiver receiver = new MyReceiver();registerReceiver(receiver, filter);This application is sending an ordered broadcast, asking other applications to open a URL:
Any application in the broadcast chain may alter the data within the intent. This malicious application is altering the URL to point to an attack site:
Intent intent = new Intent();intent.setAction("com.example.OpenURL");intent.putExtra("URL_TO_OPEN", url_string);sendOrderedBroadcastAsUser(intent);This application is sending an ordered broadcast, asking other applications to open a URL:
Any application in the broadcast chain may alter the data within the intent. This malicious application is altering the URL to point to an attack site:
public class CallReceiver extends BroadcastReceiver {@Overridepublic void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {String Url = intent.getStringExtra(Intent.URL_TO_OPEN);attackURL = "www.example.com/attack?" + Url;setResultData(attackURL);}}This application sends a special intent with a flag that allows the receiving application to read a data file for backup purposes.
Any malicious application can register to receive this intent. Because of the FLAG_GRANT_READ_URI_PERMISSION included with the intent, the malicious receiver code can read the user's data.
Intent intent = new Intent();intent.setAction("com.example.BackupUserData");intent.setData(file_uri);intent.addFlags(FLAG_GRANT_READ_URI_PERMISSION);sendBroadcast(intent);This application sends a special intent with a flag that allows the receiving application to read a data file for backup purposes.
Any malicious application can register to receive this intent. Because of the FLAG_GRANT_READ_URI_PERMISSION included with the intent, the malicious receiver code can read the user's data.
public class CallReceiver extends BroadcastReceiver {@Overridepublic void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {Uri userData = intent.getData();stealUserData(userData);}}An Android application does not use FLAG_IMMUTABLE when creating a PendingIntent.
View DetailsCWE-927: Use of Implicit Intent for Sensitive Communication is a Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) entry maintained by MITRE. The Android application uses an implicit intent for transmitting sensitive data to other applications. Since an implicit intent does not specify a particular application to receive the data, any application can process the intent by using an Intent Filter for that intent. This can allow untrusted applications to obtain sensitive data. There are two variations on the standard broadcast intent, ordered and sticky. Ordered broadcast intents are delivered to a series of registered receivers in order of priority as declared by the Receivers. A malicious receiver can give itself a high priority and cause a denial of service by stopping the broadcast from propagating further down the chain. There is also the possibility of malicious data modification, as a receiver may also alter the data within the Intent before passing it on to the next receiver. The downstream components have no way of asserting that the data has not been altered earlier in the chain. Sticky broadcast intents remain accessible after the initial broadcast. An old sticky intent will be broadcast again to any new receivers that register for it in the future, greatly increasing the chances of information exposure over time. Also, sticky broadcasts cannot be protected by permissions that may apply to other kinds of intents. In addition, any broadcast intent may include a URI that references data that the receiving component does not normally have the privileges to access. The sender of the intent can include special privileges that grant the receiver read or write access to the specific URI included in the intent. A malicious receiver that intercepts this intent will also gain those privileges and be able to read or write the resource at the specified URI.
If exploited, CWE-927 (Use of Implicit Intent for Sensitive Communication) it can compromise Confidentiality and Integrity, leading to outcomes such as Read Application Data and Varies by Context.
Recommended mitigations for CWE-927 include: If the application only requires communication with its own components, then the destination is always known, and an explicit intent could be used.
CWE-927 commonly affects Not Language-Specific. Note that weaknesses are often language-agnostic patterns, so secure coding practices apply broadly.
MITRE documents real CVEs mapped to CWE-927, including CVE-2022-4903. You can look up the full details of each CVE, including CVSS scores and remediation guidance, on our CVE Lookup tool.
A CWE (Common Weakness Enumeration) like CWE-927 describes a category of software weakness — the underlying flaw type. A CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) identifies a specific, real-world vulnerability in a particular product. In short, a CWE is the kind of mistake, and a CVE is an instance of that mistake being found in software.