The Patch Management Challenge
Most organizations face overwhelming numbers of CVEs affecting their systems. In 2024, over 29,000 CVEs were assigned. A typical mid-size organization might discover hundreds or thousands of CVEs affecting its software inventory. With limited resources and time, patching everything at once is impossible. Effective prioritization is essential to maximize security impact with available resources.
Prioritization decisions determine whether you patch the most critical vulnerabilities or waste time on minor ones. A poor prioritization strategy might focus resources on low-impact issues while critical vulnerabilities remain unpatched for months.
Scoring Framework: The Foundation
The most important factor in CVE prioritization is the CVSS score, which rates vulnerability severity on a 0.0-10.0 scale:
Critical (9.0-10.0): Patch immediately, often within days or hours. These vulnerabilities have maximum impact and pose severe risk.
High (7.0-8.9): Patch urgently, within 1-4 weeks depending on your environment's sensitivity.
Medium (4.0-6.9): Schedule patching within normal maintenance windows, typically 1-3 months.
Low (0.0-3.9): Lower priority, but don't ignore indefinitely. Schedule for routine maintenance.
However, CVSS scores alone don't tell the complete story. A critical vulnerability might be patchable easily, while a high-severity vulnerability might require extensive testing.
Beyond CVSS: Additional Prioritization Factors
1. Exploitability and Active Exploitation
Not all vulnerabilities are equally exploitable:
- Proof of concept available: If public exploits exist, the vulnerability becomes much more attractive to attackers. Actively exploited CVEs should be prioritized higher than those with no known exploits.
- Exploit difficulty: Some vulnerabilities require specific conditions or advanced techniques to exploit. Others are trivial to weaponize.
- Publicly known vs. secret exploitation: A vulnerability being actively exploited in the wild requires more urgent patching than a theoretical vulnerability.
Check threat intelligence sources and security news to determine whether CVEs affecting your systems are being actively exploited. CISA maintains a "Catalog of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities" listing CVEs with confirmed active exploitation.
2. System Criticality and Business Impact
Not all systems are equally important:
Tier 1 (Critical systems): Internet-facing systems, financial transaction systems, healthcare systems, systems handling sensitive data. A breach of these systems has severe business impact. CVE in critical systems should be patched more urgently than the same CVE in non-critical systems.
Tier 2 (Important systems): Internal systems supporting critical operations, email servers, authentication systems.
Tier 3 (Standard systems): Employee workstations, development/test systems, less critical services.
A high-severity CVE in a critical system might warrant faster patching than a critical-severity CVE in a development server that isn't exposed to external threats.
3. Asset Exposure and Attack Surface
How exposed is the vulnerable system?
- Internet-facing: Systems accessible from the internet face much higher exploitation risk than internal-only systems
- Network segmentation: Systems behind firewalls with restricted access are safer than those with open access
- Attack vector: Network-exploitable vulnerabilities are more dangerous than those requiring local access
- Authentication requirement: Vulnerabilities requiring no authentication are more critical than those requiring user credentials
A remotely exploitable vulnerability in an internet-facing system is far more urgent than a local privilege escalation requiring initial system access.
4. Patch Availability and Deployment Difficulty
Some patches are easier to deploy than others:
- Patch existence: Obvious, but some vulnerabilities have no patch yet (zero-days, EOL software)
- Deployment method: Simple package updates are faster than complex configuration changes
- Required downtime: Patches requiring system restarts are harder to schedule than those deployable without downtime
- Testing complexity: Security patches for financial systems might require extensive testing; patches for development systems might require minimal testing
- Rollback complexity: Easy-to-rollback patches are safer than those difficult to undo
A critical vulnerability with available patches deployable without downtime should be prioritized over equally critical vulnerabilities requiring complex, risky deployment.
5. Patch Release Recency
Newly released patches pose deployment risk:
- Recently released patches: Have had less real-world testing. They might introduce new bugs.
- Widely deployed patches: Have been tested by many organizations. Any critical bugs would be discovered and reported.
For non-critical vulnerabilities, waiting a few weeks for patches to mature (other organizations encounter and report bugs) reduces risk. For critical vulnerabilities, timely deployment outweighs patch recency concerns.
Practical Prioritization Matrix
Combine factors into a prioritization framework:
Priority Level 1 (Patch Immediately - Days):
- CVSS: 9.0+
- Actively exploited OR internet-facing
- Patch available
- Affects critical systems
- Examples: Critical remote code execution in web server, active zero-day exploitation
Priority Level 2 (Patch Urgently - 1-4 weeks):
- CVSS: 7.0-8.9
- Either exploited OR affecting critical systems
- Patch available
- May affect multiple systems
- Examples: High-severity vulnerabilities in database systems, auth bypass in important applications
Priority Level 3 (Patch Soon - 1-3 months):
- CVSS: 4.0-6.9
- Medium impact on operations
- Patch available
- Affects standard systems
- Examples: Medium vulnerabilities in non-critical internal systems, local privilege escalations
Priority Level 4 (Patch Eventually - Routine maintenance):
- CVSS: 0.0-3.9
- Limited exploitability
- Affects non-critical systems
- No active exploitation
- Examples: Low-severity bugs in rarely-used tools, theoretical vulnerabilities with no exploits
Priority Level 5 (Evaluate/Defer/Accept Risk):
- No patch available (EOL software, zero-days)
- Significant deployment difficulty/risk
- Acceptable compensating controls in place
- Risk accepted explicitly
- Examples: Vulnerabilities in obsolete systems planned for replacement, vulnerabilities mitigated by network segmentation
Specific CVE Triage Process
-
Identify affected systems: Use your asset inventory and vulnerability scanning tools to identify which CVEs affect your organization.
-
Assess exploitability:
- Check CVSS scores (base score, temporal metrics)
- Search threat intelligence sources for active exploitation reports
- Determine if proof-of-concept or working exploits are available
- Evaluate attack vector (network, local, physical)
-
Assess impact:
- Determine system criticality
- Identify whether systems are internet-facing or internal
- Evaluate data sensitivity of affected systems
- Determine potential business impact
-
Assess patch feasibility:
- Determine if patches are available
- Understand deployment difficulty
- Estimate required testing time
- Identify potential rollback challenges
-
Assign priority level: Using your framework, assign each CVE to a priority level with target remediation timeline.
-
Schedule remediation: Create remediation tickets with target dates based on priority.
-
Track progress: Monitor patch deployment progress and escalate delayed remediations.
Handling High Volume
When dozens or hundreds of CVEs affect your organization:
Phase 1 (Immediate - same day):
- Identify critical/high severity vulnerabilities being actively exploited
- Assess whether your organization is affected
- Start immediate remediation of most critical issues
Phase 2 (1-7 days):
- Complete triage of all high and critical severity CVEs
- Begin remediation of non-exploited high-severity vulnerabilities
Phase 3 (1-4 weeks):
- Remediate remaining high-severity CVEs
- Begin medium-severity vulnerability remediation
- Develop strategies for medium-severity issues not yet patchable
Phase 4 (Ongoing):
- Continuous remediation of lower-severity vulnerabilities
- Routine vulnerability management processes
This phased approach ensures the most critical risks are addressed first while maintaining ongoing progress on lower-severity issues.
Special Cases and Exceptions
Zero-day vulnerabilities: No patches exist, so traditional patching isn't possible. Implement compensating controls (network segmentation, monitoring, workarounds).
End-of-Life (EOL) software: No patches will be released. Either migrate to supported software or implement risk acceptance with compensating controls.
Software you can't update: Some systems can't be restarted or updated without disrupting critical operations. Document the risk and implement mitigations.
Required vs. recommended patches: Security vendors sometimes release patches for theoretical or difficult-to-exploit vulnerabilities alongside critical patches. Focus on required patches first.
Tool Support for Prioritization
Vulnerability management platforms help with prioritization:
- Tenable.io, Qualys, Rapid7 InsightVM: Provide CVSS scores, threat intelligence, asset criticality ratings, and prioritization recommendations
- Patch management tools: Many include prioritization features based on criticality and asset importance
- Threat intelligence platforms: Track actively exploited vulnerabilities
- Custom scripts: Organizations often create custom tools that score vulnerabilities based on their specific factors
SLA Framework
Establish Service Level Agreements for CVE remediation:
Critical (CVSS 9.0-10.0):
- Internet-facing systems: 1-7 days
- Internal critical systems: 7-14 days
- Non-critical systems: 30 days
High (CVSS 7.0-8.9):
- Internet-facing systems: 1-4 weeks
- Internal critical systems: 2-8 weeks
- Non-critical systems: 60 days
Medium (CVSS 4.0-6.9):
- All systems: 1-3 months
Low (CVSS 0.0-3.9):
- All systems: 1-6 months or routine maintenance
Adjust based on your organization's risk tolerance and resources.
Tracking and Reporting
Maintain metrics on your CVE remediation:
- Number of critical CVEs unpatched (trend should be declining)
- Average time to patch by severity level
- Remediation SLA compliance percentage
- Number of systems affected by each CVE
- Patch deployment pipeline (backlog, in-testing, scheduled, deployed)
Regular reporting helps demonstrate progress and identify bottlenecks.
Conclusion
CVE prioritization combines CVSS scores with factors including exploitability, system criticality, exposure, patch availability, and organizational risk tolerance. A prioritized approach ensures critical vulnerabilities are addressed quickly while lower-severity issues are handled through routine processes. Implement a formal prioritization framework, establish SLAs, and track progress to ensure your organization addresses the most dangerous vulnerabilities while systematically managing the full vulnerability landscape. With effective prioritization, limited patching resources can have maximum security impact.
