CVE-2026-7669
A vulnerability was detected in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.9. Impacted is the function get_tokenizer of the file python/sglang/srt/utils/hf_transformers_utils.py of the component HuggingFace Transformer Handler. The manipulation of the argument trust_remote_code with the input False as part of Boolean results in code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitability is considered difficult. In get_tokenizer(), when the caller passes trust_remote_code=False and HuggingFace transformers v5 returns a TokenizersBackend instance (the generic fallback for tokenizer classes not in the registry), SGLang silently re-invokes AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained with trust_remote_code=True, overriding the caller's explicit security setting. A model repository containing a malicious tokenizer.py referenced via auto_map in tokenizer_config.json will execute arbitrary Python in the SGLang process during this second call. No log line or warning is emitted. The override affects all current SGLang versions because transformers==5.3.0 is pinned in pyproject.toml. Both tokenizer_mode="auto" and tokenizer_mode="slow" are affected. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Vulnerability Summary
CVSS v3 Score
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS v2 Score
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
EPSS Score (Exploitation Probability)
This vulnerability has a 0.02% probability of being exploited in the next 30 days, ranking higher than 5% of all scored CVEs.
Related Vulnerabilities
Same Weakness Type(CWE-74, CWE-94)
An HTML injection vulnerability in the notification email for "Slow Redirect" and "Cloned Website" Canarytokens exists in Thinkst Applied Research Canarytokens, enabling Interface Manipulation, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in emails clients that render HTML emails. This issue affects Canarytokens: from Docker tag sha-c42435e before sha-bfda4df, from Git commit c42435e before bfda4df.
A vulnerability was detected in SourceCodester Pizzafy E-Commerce System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function Login of the file /admin/admin_class_novo.php of the component Administrative Control Panel. The manipulation of the argument Username results in sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.
A vulnerability was detected in itsourcecode Fees Management System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /manage_payment.php. The manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.
A security vulnerability has been detected in 1Panel-dev CordysCRM up to 1.4.1. This impacts the function Save of the file src/main/java/cn/cordys/crm/system/service/ModuleFormService.java of the component ModuleFormController. The manipulation of the argument Description leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 1.7.0 will fix this issue. The identifier of the patch is c87682afa8df79853299f75489c9d333f7bc5fce. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
A weakness has been identified in elunez eladmin up to 2.7. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file App.java of the component Application Deployment Module. This manipulation of the argument uploadPath causes command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Similar SeverityMEDIUM
OP-TEE is a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) designed as companion to a non-secure Linux kernel running on Arm; Cortex-A cores using the TrustZone technology. Starting in version 4.3.0 and prior to version 4.11.0, a type confusion vulnerability exists in OP-TEE OS when processing an FFA_MEM_SHARE request from the normal world. This only applies when OP-TEE is configured as an SPMC for S-EL0 SPs, that is, with `CFG_CORE_SEL1_SPMC=y` and `CFG_SECURE_PARTITION=y`. Version 4.11.0 fixes the issue.
OP-TEE is a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) designed as companion to a non-secure Linux kernel running on Arm; Cortex-A cores using the TrustZone technology. Prior to version 4.11.0, on many of the ECDH shared secret paths, the public key isn't verified to be a point on the correct curve. By passing approximately 30-40 crafted public keys to OP-TEE, the private key can be reconstructed by a normal world attacker. When calling TEE_DeriveKey the public key is provided with full X and Y values, but the (X, Y) point might not satisfy the `Y^2 == X^3 + aX + b mod P` math for the specific curve that is used. When those public keys aren't rejected, the attacker can select public keys such that each DeriveKey call will leak `d % r` where `d` is the private key and `r` comes from the relationship between the correct curve and the attacker selected curve. With enough leaked data the Chinese remainder theorem can be used to recover the full private key. Version 4.11.0 fixes the issue.
daphne before 4.2.2 did not pass maxFramePayloadSize or maxMessagePayloadSize to Autobahn's WebSocketServerFactory. Because Autobahn defaults both values to 0 (unlimited), an unauthenticated remote attacker could send arbitrarily large WebSocket messages or frames, causing excessive memory consumption and a denial of service.
An improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Backup Task functionality in Synology Hyper Backup before 4.1.2-4036 allows remote authenticated users to write specific files via unspecified vectors.
An improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Backup.Repository webapi component in Synology Hyper Backup before 4.1.2-4036 allows remote authenticated users with administrator privileges to write specific files containing non-sensitive information via unspecified vectors.
Learn More
View this score breakdown or calculate a custom score
Learn how severity scores are calculated and what they mean
Best practices for deciding which vulnerabilities to address first
Essential guide to Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures