CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm

ClassDraftExploit Likelihood: High

The product uses a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm or protocol.

View on MITRE
Back to CWE Lookup

Extended Description

Cryptographic algorithms are the methods by which data is scrambled to prevent observation or influence by unauthorized actors. Insecure cryptography can be exploited to expose sensitive information, modify data in unexpected ways, spoof identities of other users or devices, or other impacts. It is very difficult to produce a secure algorithm, and even high-profile algorithms by accomplished cryptographic experts have been broken. Well-known techniques exist to break or weaken various kinds of cryptography. Accordingly, there are a small number of well-understood and heavily studied algorithms that should be used by most products. Using a non-standard or known-insecure algorithm is dangerous because a determined adversary may be able to break the algorithm and compromise whatever data has been protected. Since the state of cryptography advances so rapidly, it is common for an algorithm to be considered "unsafe" even if it was once thought to be strong. This can happen when new attacks are discovered, or if computing power increases so much that the cryptographic algorithm no longer provides the amount of protection that was originally thought. For a number of reasons, this weakness is even more challenging to manage with hardware deployment of cryptographic algorithms as opposed to software implementation. First, if a flaw is discovered with hardware-implemented cryptography, the flaw cannot be fixed in most cases without a recall of the product, because hardware is not easily replaceable like software. Second, because the hardware product is expected to work for years, the adversary's computing power will only increase over time.

Technical Details

Structure
Simple

Applicable To

Languages
VerilogVHDLNot Language-Specific
Platforms

Source-backed guidance

Additional facts reviewed against primary or authoritative security sources.

Verify controls for CWE-327 with SSDF evidence

Use NIST SSDF verification and vulnerability-response practices to detect CWE-327, Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm, throughout the product lifecycle. Derive review questions, static or dynamic checks, and negative tests from the CWE's causal behavior; define the components and lifecycle stages each check covers; and retain findings with enough evidence to distinguish the root cause from symptoms and impacts. Track escapes and false negatives, then improve the verification plan after every confirmed occurrence.

NIST SP 800-218 Secure Software Development FrameworkNational Institute of Standards and Technology

Apply Libraries or Frameworks controls for Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm

MITRE associates mitigation with Architecture and Design, and Implementation; the listed strategies include Libraries or Frameworks; documented detection approaches include Automated Analysis, Manual Analysis, Automated Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode, and Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode. Use these source-defined anchors to turn CWE-327 into implementation, review, and verification checks for the affected component.

CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic AlgorithmMITRE CWE

Triage CWE-327 against known exploitation evidence

Use CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog to test whether a vulnerability mapped to CWE-327, Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm, has evidence of exploitation in the wild. Confirm the CVE-to-CWE root-cause mapping independently before attaching the example, then capture the affected product, required action, and remediation deadline. A missing KEV match is not evidence that the weakness is unexploited, and a KEV entry must not be generalized to every occurrence of this CWE.

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities CatalogCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency

Apply precise root-cause mapping to CWE-327

Apply MITRE's full root-cause mapping guidance when using CWE-327, Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm. Separate weakness language from attacker prerequisites and technical impact, check the entry's abstraction and vulnerability-mapping notes, and prefer the most specific Base or Variant supported by the evidence. Record the rejected alternatives and require an independent review before the mapping is used for remediation trends or program metrics.

CVE to CWE Root Cause Mapping GuidanceMITRE CWE

Validate CWE-327 with root-cause mapping checks

Apply MITRE's root-cause mapping quick tips to CWE-327, Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm. Confirm the finding describes the causal weakness rather than an impact or attack pattern, compare the abstraction and mapping notes with plausible alternatives, and have a second reviewer challenge the selection. Preserve the evidence and reasoning so recurring defects can be measured against one consistent identifier.

CVE to CWE Root Cause Mapping Quick TipsMITRE CWE

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm?+

CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm is a Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) entry maintained by MITRE. The product uses a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm or protocol. Cryptographic algorithms are the methods by which data is scrambled to prevent observation or influence by unauthorized actors. Insecure cryptography can be exploited to expose sensitive information, modify data in unexpected ways, spoof identities of other users or devices, or other impacts. It is very difficult to produce a secure algorithm, and even high-profile algorithms by accomplished cryptographic experts have been broken. Well-known techniques exist to break or weaken various kinds of cryptography. Accordingly, there are a small number of well-understood and heavily studied algorithms that should be used by most products. Using a non-standard or known-insecure algorithm is dangerous because a determined adversary may be able to break the algorithm and compromise whatever data has been protected. Since the state of cryptography advances so rapidly, it is common for an algorithm to be considered "unsafe" even if it was once thought to be strong. This can happen when new attacks are discovered, or if computing power increases so much that the cryptographic algorithm no longer provides the amount of protection that was originally thought. For a number of reasons, this weakness is even more challenging to manage with hardware deployment of cryptographic algorithms as opposed to software implementation. First, if a flaw is discovered with hardware-implemented cryptography, the flaw cannot be fixed in most cases without a recall of the product, because hardware is not easily replaceable like software. Second, because the hardware product is expected to work for years, the adversary's computing power will only increase over time.

What are the security consequences of Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm?+

If exploited, CWE-327 (Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm) it can compromise Confidentiality, Integrity, Accountability and Non-Repudiation, leading to outcomes such as Read Application Data, Modify Application Data and Hide Activities.

How do you prevent or mitigate Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm?+

Recommended mitigations for CWE-327 include: Carefully manage and protect cryptographic keys (see CWE-320). If the keys can be guessed or stolen, then the strength of the cryptography itself is irrelevant.

How is Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm detected?+

CWE-327 can be detected using Automated Analysis, Automated Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode, Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode, Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation, Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation and Manual Static Analysis - Source Code. Combining automated tooling with manual review typically yields the best coverage.

Which programming languages are affected by Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm?+

CWE-327 commonly affects Verilog, VHDL and Not Language-Specific. Note that weaknesses are often language-agnostic patterns, so secure coding practices apply broadly.

What are real-world examples of Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm?+

MITRE documents real CVEs mapped to CWE-327, including CVE-2022-30273, CVE-2022-30320, CVE-2008-3775, CVE-2007-4150 and CVE-2007-5460. You can look up the full details of each CVE, including CVSS scores and remediation guidance, on our CVE Lookup tool.

What is the difference between a CWE and a CVE?+

A CWE (Common Weakness Enumeration) like CWE-327 describes a category of software weakness — the underlying flaw type. A CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) identifies a specific, real-world vulnerability in a particular product. In short, a CWE is the kind of mistake, and a CVE is an instance of that mistake being found in software.

Learn More

Advertisement
CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm | CWE Lookup | InventiveHQ