Choosing between PostgreSQL and MySQL is one of the most consequential infrastructure decisions for any application. Both are mature, production-proven relational databases used by organizations from startups to Fortune 500 companies. While performance and features often dominate the comparison, security capabilities should weigh heavily in the decision.
PostgreSQL and MySQL take different approaches to authentication, access control, encryption, and auditing. These differences matter significantly for enterprises dealing with sensitive data, regulatory requirements, and sophisticated threat models.
This guide compares the security features of PostgreSQL and MySQL, helping you make an informed choice based on your security and compliance needs.
Overview Comparison
Both databases have been production-proven for decades, but they evolved with different philosophies.
PostgreSQL Background
PostgreSQL originated at UC Berkeley in 1986 and has been open source since 1996. It prioritizes:
- SQL standards compliance: Closest to ANSI SQL standards
- Data integrity: ACID compliance is paramount
- Extensibility: Custom types, functions, operators
- Advanced features: Complex queries, JSON, full-text search, geospatial
Known for handling complex workloads, analytics, and scenarios requiring strict data integrity.
MySQL Background
MySQL was created in 1995 and acquired by Oracle in 2010. It prioritizes:
- Performance: Optimized for read-heavy workloads
- Simplicity: Easier to set up and administer
- Widespread adoption: Most popular open-source database
- Web application focus: Powers WordPress, Wikipedia, Facebook
Known for web applications, content management, and high-read scenarios.
License Considerations
PostgreSQL: PostgreSQL License (permissive, similar to MIT/BSD). Use, modify, and distribute freely without restrictions. No commercial licensing concerns.
MySQL: Dual-licensed. GPL for open-source use, commercial license required for proprietary distribution. The Oracle ownership creates concerns for some organizations about long-term direction.
MariaDB: MySQL fork under GPL, created after Oracle acquisition. Drop-in MySQL replacement with additional features and no Oracle ties.
Authentication Features
Authentication is your first line of database defense.
PostgreSQL Authentication
PostgreSQL supports extensive authentication methods configured in pg_hba.conf:
Supported methods:
| Method | Description |
|---|---|
| trust | No authentication (dangerous) |
| password | Plain text password (not recommended) |
| md5 | MD5-hashed password |
| scram-sha-256 | Modern, strongest built-in method |
| cert | SSL certificate authentication |
| ldap | LDAP directory authentication |
| radius | RADIUS server authentication |
| pam | Pluggable Authentication Modules |
| gss | Kerberos/GSSAPI authentication |
| peer | OS username matching (Unix sockets) |
SCRAM-SHA-256 (recommended):
# postgresql.conf
password_encryption = 'scram-sha-256'
# pg_hba.conf
host all all 0.0.0.0/0 scram-sha-256
SCRAM-SHA-256 provides channel binding, preventing man-in-the-middle attacks, and stores passwords more securely than MD5.
LDAP configuration:
# pg_hba.conf
host all all 10.0.0.0/8 ldap ldapserver=ldap.example.com ldapbasedn="dc=example,dc=com" ldapbinddn="cn=admin,dc=example,dc=com" ldapbindpasswd="secret"
Certificate authentication:
# pg_hba.conf
hostssl all all 0.0.0.0/0 cert clientcert=verify-ca
MySQL Authentication
MySQL 8.0+ uses caching_sha2_password by default:
Supported plugins:
| Plugin | Description |
|---|---|
| caching_sha2_password | Default in MySQL 8.0+ |
| mysql_native_password | Legacy, MD5-based |
| sha256_password | SHA-256 without caching |
| authentication_ldap_simple | LDAP (Enterprise) |
| authentication_kerberos | Kerberos (Enterprise) |
| authentication_pam | PAM (Enterprise) |
Note: LDAP, Kerberos, and PAM require MySQL Enterprise Edition (commercial license).
Configuration:
-- Create user with caching_sha2_password
CREATE USER 'appuser'@'%'
IDENTIFIED WITH caching_sha2_password BY 'SecureP@ssw0rd';
-- Set default authentication plugin
SET GLOBAL default_authentication_plugin = 'caching_sha2_password';
Authentication Comparison
| Feature | PostgreSQL | MySQL |
|---|---|---|
| SCRAM-SHA-256 | Yes | No |
| Kerberos | Yes (built-in) | Enterprise only |
| LDAP | Yes (built-in) | Enterprise only |
| PAM | Yes (built-in) | Enterprise only |
| Certificate auth | Yes | Yes |
| Per-database auth rules | Yes (pg_hba.conf) | Limited |
| Connection-based rules | Yes (host, IP, method) | Limited |
Winner for authentication: PostgreSQL offers more flexible, granular authentication with enterprise features included in the open-source version.
Access Control
Fine-grained access control determines what authenticated users can do.
PostgreSQL Access Control
Role-Based Access Control:
PostgreSQL uses roles (which can be users or groups):
-- Create roles
CREATE ROLE developers;
CREATE ROLE readonly_users;
-- Create user and assign to role
CREATE USER dev1 WITH PASSWORD 'password';
GRANT developers TO dev1;
-- Grant permissions to role
GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO developers;
GRANT SELECT ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO readonly_users;
Row-Level Security (RLS):
PostgreSQL's standout feature—restrict which rows users can access:
-- Enable RLS on table
ALTER TABLE customer_data ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;
-- Create policy: users can only see their own data
CREATE POLICY user_isolation_policy ON customer_data
FOR ALL
USING (user_id = current_user_id())
WITH CHECK (user_id = current_user_id());
-- Policy for admins: can see all data
CREATE POLICY admin_access ON customer_data
FOR ALL
TO admin_role
USING (true);
RLS enforces data isolation at the database level—application bugs can't accidentally expose other users' data.
Column-Level Permissions:
-- Grant access to specific columns only
GRANT SELECT (name, email) ON users TO support_role;
-- Note: support_role cannot see sensitive columns like password_hash, ssn
Schema-Level Isolation:
-- Create separate schemas for different tenants
CREATE SCHEMA tenant_a;
CREATE SCHEMA tenant_b;
-- Grant schema access
GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA tenant_a TO tenant_a_users;
REVOKE ALL ON SCHEMA tenant_b FROM tenant_a_users;
MySQL Access Control
User Privileges:
MySQL uses a more traditional privilege system:
-- Grant specific privileges
GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE ON myapp.* TO 'appuser'@'%';
-- Grant column-specific privileges
GRANT SELECT (name, email) ON myapp.users TO 'support'@'%';
-- Show grants
SHOW GRANTS FOR 'appuser'@'%';
Roles (MySQL 8.0+):
-- Create role
CREATE ROLE 'app_read', 'app_write';
-- Grant privileges to role
GRANT SELECT ON myapp.* TO 'app_read';
GRANT INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON myapp.* TO 'app_write';
-- Assign role to user
GRANT 'app_read', 'app_write' TO 'appuser'@'%';
-- Activate roles
SET DEFAULT ROLE ALL TO 'appuser'@'%';
No Row-Level Security:
MySQL doesn't have built-in RLS. You must implement row isolation in application code or use views:
-- Workaround using views
CREATE VIEW user_data_view AS
SELECT * FROM customer_data
WHERE user_id = @current_user_id;
GRANT SELECT ON user_data_view TO app_users;
This is less secure—application bugs or direct database access can bypass the view.
Access Control Comparison
| Feature | PostgreSQL | MySQL |
|---|---|---|
| Role-based access | Yes | Yes (8.0+) |
| Row-Level Security | Yes (built-in) | No |
| Column privileges | Yes | Yes |
| Schema isolation | Yes | Limited (database level) |
| Default deny | Yes | Yes |
| Object ownership | Yes | Yes |
Winner for access control: PostgreSQL with RLS provides significantly stronger multi-tenant isolation and fine-grained access control.
Encryption
Encryption protects data in transit and at rest.
PostgreSQL Encryption
SSL/TLS (in transit):
# postgresql.conf
ssl = on
ssl_cert_file = 'server.crt'
ssl_key_file = 'server.key'
ssl_ca_file = 'ca.crt'
ssl_ciphers = 'HIGH:MEDIUM:!LOW:!aNULL:!MD5'
ssl_min_protocol_version = 'TLSv1.2'
# pg_hba.conf - require SSL
hostssl all all 0.0.0.0/0 scram-sha-256
Data at rest:
PostgreSQL doesn't include built-in transparent data encryption (TDE). Options:
- Filesystem encryption: LUKS, dm-crypt, BitLocker
- Cloud provider encryption: AWS EBS encryption, Azure disk encryption
- pgcrypto extension: Column-level encryption
-- Column encryption with pgcrypto
CREATE EXTENSION pgcrypto;
-- Encrypt sensitive data
INSERT INTO users (email, ssn_encrypted)
VALUES ('[email protected]', pgp_sym_encrypt('123-45-6789', 'encryption_key'));
-- Decrypt when needed
SELECT email, pgp_sym_decrypt(ssn_encrypted, 'encryption_key') as ssn
FROM users;
Enterprise options:
- EnterpriseDB (EDB) offers TDE in their commercial PostgreSQL distribution
MySQL Encryption
SSL/TLS (in transit):
# my.cnf
[mysqld]
require_secure_transport = ON
ssl_cert = /path/to/server-cert.pem
ssl_key = /path/to/server-key.pem
ssl_ca = /path/to/ca-cert.pem
tls_version = TLSv1.2,TLSv1.3
Transparent Data Encryption (TDE):
MySQL Enterprise Edition includes TDE:
-- Enable TDE (Enterprise only)
ALTER INSTANCE ROTATE INNODB MASTER KEY;
-- Create encrypted tablespace
CREATE TABLESPACE encrypted_ts
ADD DATAFILE 'encrypted.ibd'
ENCRYPTION='Y';
Community Edition options:
-- Column-level encryption
INSERT INTO users (email, ssn_encrypted)
VALUES ('[email protected]', AES_ENCRYPT('123-45-6789', 'encryption_key'));
SELECT email, AES_DECRYPT(ssn_encrypted, 'encryption_key') as ssn
FROM users;
Encryption Comparison
| Feature | PostgreSQL | MySQL |
|---|---|---|
| SSL/TLS | Yes | Yes |
| TLS 1.3 | Yes | Yes |
| TDE built-in | No | Enterprise only |
| Column encryption | pgcrypto extension | AES functions |
| Keyring management | No | Enterprise only |
Draw: Both require enterprise editions or external tools for full TDE. Both support strong TLS and column-level encryption.
Auditing and Compliance
Auditing tracks who did what and when—essential for compliance.
PostgreSQL Auditing
Built-in logging:
# postgresql.conf
log_statement = 'all' # none, ddl, mod, all
log_connections = on
log_disconnections = on
log_duration = on
log_line_prefix = '%t [%p]: user=%u,db=%d,app=%a,client=%h '
pgAudit extension (recommended for compliance):
-- Install extension
CREATE EXTENSION pgaudit;
# postgresql.conf
shared_preload_libraries = 'pgaudit'
pgaudit.log = 'read, write, ddl, role'
pgaudit.log_catalog = off
pgAudit provides detailed session and object-level auditing that meets SOX, PCI-DSS, and HIPAA requirements.
Example audit log:
AUDIT: SESSION,1,1,READ,SELECT,TABLE,public.customer_data,SELECT * FROM customer_data WHERE id = 100
MySQL Auditing
General query log (not recommended for production):
# my.cnf
general_log = 1
general_log_file = /var/log/mysql/query.log
MySQL Enterprise Audit (commercial):
-- Install audit plugin (Enterprise only)
INSTALL PLUGIN audit_log SONAME 'audit_log.so';
-- Configure audit policy
SET GLOBAL audit_log_policy = 'ALL';
Community alternatives:
- MariaDB Audit Plugin (works with MySQL)
- Percona Audit Log Plugin
Compliance Capabilities
| Requirement | PostgreSQL | MySQL |
|---|---|---|
| PCI-DSS audit trail | pgAudit (free) | Enterprise or third-party |
| HIPAA audit logs | pgAudit (free) | Enterprise or third-party |
| SOX compliance | pgAudit (free) | Enterprise or third-party |
| GDPR data access logs | pgAudit (free) | Enterprise or third-party |
Winner for auditing: PostgreSQL with pgAudit provides enterprise-grade auditing at no cost.
Replication and High Availability
Security depends on data availability—if your database is down, your application is vulnerable.
PostgreSQL Replication
Streaming replication:
# Primary postgresql.conf
wal_level = replica
max_wal_senders = 3
wal_keep_size = 1GB
# Replica pg_hba.conf
host replication replicator 10.0.0.0/8 scram-sha-256
Synchronous replication (zero data loss):
synchronous_standby_names = 'replica1,replica2'
synchronous_commit = on
Logical replication (table-level):
-- On publisher
CREATE PUBLICATION my_publication FOR TABLE users, orders;
-- On subscriber
CREATE SUBSCRIPTION my_subscription
CONNECTION 'host=primary dbname=mydb user=replicator password=secret'
PUBLICATION my_publication;
MySQL Replication
Binary log replication:
# Primary my.cnf
server-id = 1
log_bin = mysql-bin
binlog_format = ROW
gtid_mode = ON
enforce_gtid_consistency = ON
Group Replication (multi-primary):
-- Enable Group Replication
SET GLOBAL group_replication_bootstrap_group = ON;
START GROUP_REPLICATION;
MySQL InnoDB Cluster: Integrated high-availability solution combining Group Replication with MySQL Shell and MySQL Router.
HA Comparison
| Feature | PostgreSQL | MySQL |
|---|---|---|
| Streaming replication | Yes | Yes (binlog) |
| Synchronous replication | Yes | Yes |
| Logical replication | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-primary | Limited (BDR extension) | Group Replication |
| Automatic failover | External tools (Patroni) | InnoDB Cluster |
Draw: Both provide robust replication. MySQL InnoDB Cluster offers easier integrated HA; PostgreSQL typically uses external tools like Patroni.
Performance and Scalability
Security features shouldn't cripple performance.
General Performance Characteristics
PostgreSQL:
- Excellent for complex queries, analytics, joins
- Better write performance with MVCC
- Handles concurrent writes well
- Memory-intensive for complex operations
MySQL:
- Optimized for simple queries and reads
- Faster for basic CRUD operations
- Lower memory footprint
- Better performance for read-heavy workloads
Security Feature Performance Impact
| Feature | PostgreSQL Impact | MySQL Impact |
|---|---|---|
| SSL/TLS | 5-10% overhead | 5-10% overhead |
| Row-Level Security | 1-5% overhead | N/A |
| Audit logging | 5-15% overhead | 5-15% overhead |
| Column encryption | Significant (use selectively) | Significant (use selectively) |
RLS in PostgreSQL adds minimal overhead for the security benefits it provides.
Connection Pooling
Both databases benefit from connection pooling for security and performance:
PostgreSQL: PgBouncer, Pgpool-II
# pgbouncer.ini
[databases]
mydb = host=localhost port=5432 dbname=mydb
[pgbouncer]
pool_mode = transaction
max_client_conn = 1000
default_pool_size = 20
MySQL: ProxySQL, MySQL Router
# ProxySQL example
mysql_servers:
- address: "primary"
port: 3306
hostgroup: 0
mysql_users:
- username: "appuser"
password: "secret"
default_hostgroup: 0
When to Choose Each
Choose PostgreSQL When
- Row-Level Security is needed: Multi-tenant applications, healthcare (HIPAA), finance
- Complex access control: Fine-grained permissions beyond basic RBAC
- Enterprise auth without enterprise cost: LDAP, Kerberos, RADIUS in community edition
- Compliance auditing: pgAudit provides comprehensive audit trails
- Complex queries and analytics: Security monitoring dashboards, SIEM integration
- Data integrity is paramount: Financial transactions, healthcare records
Choose MySQL When
- Simplicity is priority: Faster setup, easier administration
- Read-heavy workloads: Content management, caching layers
- Large ecosystem required: WordPress, many PHP applications assume MySQL
- Basic security sufficient: Applications without multi-tenant isolation needs
- Budget for Enterprise Edition: TDE, audit, enterprise auth available commercially
- Existing MySQL expertise: Team familiarity reduces misconfiguration risk
Use Cases by Industry
| Industry | Recommendation | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Healthcare | PostgreSQL | RLS for patient data isolation, pgAudit for HIPAA |
| Finance | PostgreSQL | Data integrity, complex transactions, RLS |
| E-commerce | Either | MySQL for catalog reads, PostgreSQL for transactions |
| SaaS Multi-tenant | PostgreSQL | RLS is essential for tenant isolation |
| Content/Media | MySQL | Read-heavy, simpler requirements |
| Analytics | PostgreSQL | Complex queries, window functions |
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Which is more secure, PostgreSQL or MySQL?
PostgreSQL offers more comprehensive security features in its free community edition, including Row-Level Security, SCRAM-SHA-256 authentication, and enterprise authentication (LDAP, Kerberos) without additional licensing. MySQL requires Enterprise Edition for comparable features. For multi-tenant applications or strict compliance requirements, PostgreSQL is generally the more secure choice out of the box.
2. What is Row-Level Security in PostgreSQL?
Row-Level Security (RLS) allows database administrators to define policies that control which rows users can see or modify. For example, a policy can ensure users only see their own data: USING (user_id = current_user_id()). RLS enforces data isolation at the database level, so even direct SQL queries or application bugs can't access unauthorized data. MySQL doesn't have this feature.
3. Does MySQL support encryption at rest?
MySQL Enterprise Edition includes Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) for encrypting data at rest. The community edition doesn't include TDE—you must use filesystem-level encryption (LUKS, BitLocker) or column-level encryption with AES functions. MariaDB, the MySQL fork, offers encryption features in its community edition.
4. Which database is better for compliance?
PostgreSQL with pgAudit provides comprehensive audit logging that meets PCI-DSS, HIPAA, SOX, and GDPR requirements at no cost. MySQL's equivalent audit capabilities require Enterprise Edition. For organizations with compliance requirements and limited budgets, PostgreSQL offers more complete security tooling without commercial licensing.
5. Is PostgreSQL harder to learn than MySQL?
PostgreSQL has more features and stricter SQL compliance, which creates a slightly steeper learning curve. However, basic operations are similar. PostgreSQL's additional complexity—RLS, schemas, advanced types—provides security and functionality benefits once understood. For teams prioritizing security, the investment in PostgreSQL knowledge pays dividends.
6. Can I migrate from MySQL to PostgreSQL?
Yes, tools like pgLoader automate MySQL to PostgreSQL migration. However, there are differences in data types, SQL syntax, and stored procedures that require attention. For security-sensitive migrations, plan for thorough testing, especially if implementing RLS or changing authentication methods post-migration.
7. Which has better performance?
It depends on workload. MySQL is often faster for simple read-heavy queries (web applications, content sites). PostgreSQL handles complex queries, writes, and concurrent transactions better. For security features specifically, RLS adds minimal overhead (1-5%) in PostgreSQL—a small price for the security benefits.
8. What are the licensing differences?
PostgreSQL uses the permissive PostgreSQL License—use freely without restrictions. MySQL is dual-licensed: GPL for open-source projects, commercial license required for proprietary distribution. Oracle's ownership of MySQL concerns some organizations about long-term direction. MariaDB (MySQL fork) maintains fully open-source licensing.
9. Which is better for web applications?
Traditionally MySQL dominated web applications (WordPress, Drupal, many PHP frameworks). However, PostgreSQL works well for modern web apps (Django, Ruby on Rails, Node.js frameworks support both). If your application has multi-tenant requirements or handles sensitive data, PostgreSQL's security features often outweigh MySQL's slight performance advantage.
10. Do cloud providers support both equally?
Yes, all major cloud providers offer managed services for both: AWS RDS/Aurora, Google Cloud SQL, Azure Database. Feature parity varies—check specific security features (TDE, audit logging) availability on your provider's managed service. Some providers offer PostgreSQL-compatible options with enhanced features (Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL, Azure Cosmos DB for PostgreSQL).
Conclusion
PostgreSQL and MySQL are both excellent databases with decades of production use. For security-focused decisions:
PostgreSQL offers more complete security in its free community edition—Row-Level Security, enterprise authentication methods, and comprehensive auditing with pgAudit. Organizations with multi-tenant applications, strict compliance requirements, or limited budgets for enterprise database licenses will find PostgreSQL more suitable.
MySQL remains the simpler choice for applications with basic security requirements and read-heavy workloads. If your organization can budget for MySQL Enterprise Edition, you gain TDE, enterprise audit, and advanced authentication—closing the security gap with PostgreSQL.
The "right" choice depends on your specific requirements. Evaluate based on your data sensitivity, compliance obligations, multi-tenancy needs, and budget. Security features should weigh heavily alongside performance and ecosystem considerations when making this long-term infrastructure decision.
Related Tools
- SQL Formatter - Format and beautify SQL queries for both PostgreSQL and MySQL