CVE-2025-52606
HCL iControl was affected by Weak Input Validation vulnerability. This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic. Received input that is expected to be of a certain type, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input is actually of the expected type.
Vulnerability Summary
CVSS v3 Score
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CWE Classification
Related Vulnerabilities
Same Weakness Type(CWE-209)
HCL iControl v4.0.0 was affected by Unhandled Exception - Stack Trace Disclosure vulnerability. The error occurs due to an undefined property being accessed in the application's JavaScript code. Specifically, the code attempts to read the property dashboard key from an object that is undefined. This issue likely stems from one of the following: A missing or improperly initialized object.
HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management is vulnerable to poor unhandled exceptions which exposes sensitive information. An attacker can exploit use this information to exploit known vulnerabilities launch targeted attacks, such as remote code execution or denial of service.
loginok.html in Wing FTP Server before 7.4.4 discloses the full local installation path of the application when using a long value in the UID cookie.
core/authorize.php in Drupal 11.x-dev allows Full Path Disclosure (even when error logging is None) if the value of hash_salt is file_get_contents of a file that does not exist.
A verbose error handling issue in the proxy service implemented in the GravityZone Update Server allows an attacker to cause a server-side request forgery. This issue only affects GravityZone Console versions before 6.38.1-5 running only on premise.
Similar SeverityMEDIUM
A vulnerability was detected in keystonejs keystone up to 20260319. This vulnerability affects unknown code in the library packages/core/src/lib/core/queries/output-field.ts of the component GraphQL API Endpoint. The manipulation results in resource consumption. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere vulnerability in Tips and Tricks HQ WP eMember allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. This issue affects WP eMember: from n/a through v10.2.2.
Out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Samsung Open Source rlottie allows Overflow Buffers. This issue affects rlottie: before dcfde72eae1b0464dc0dd760aec00ada6a148635.
OP-TEE is a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) designed as companion to a non-secure Linux kernel running on Arm; Cortex-A cores using the TrustZone technology. Starting in version 4.3.0 and prior to version 4.11.0, a type confusion vulnerability exists in OP-TEE OS when processing an FFA_MEM_SHARE request from the normal world. This only applies when OP-TEE is configured as an SPMC for S-EL0 SPs, that is, with `CFG_CORE_SEL1_SPMC=y` and `CFG_SECURE_PARTITION=y`. Version 4.11.0 fixes the issue.
OP-TEE is a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) designed as companion to a non-secure Linux kernel running on Arm; Cortex-A cores using the TrustZone technology. Prior to version 4.11.0, on many of the ECDH shared secret paths, the public key isn't verified to be a point on the correct curve. By passing approximately 30-40 crafted public keys to OP-TEE, the private key can be reconstructed by a normal world attacker. When calling TEE_DeriveKey the public key is provided with full X and Y values, but the (X, Y) point might not satisfy the `Y^2 == X^3 + aX + b mod P` math for the specific curve that is used. When those public keys aren't rejected, the attacker can select public keys such that each DeriveKey call will leak `d % r` where `d` is the private key and `r` comes from the relationship between the correct curve and the attacker selected curve. With enough leaked data the Chinese remainder theorem can be used to recover the full private key. Version 4.11.0 fixes the issue.
Learn More
View this score breakdown or calculate a custom score
Learn how severity scores are calculated and what they mean
Best practices for deciding which vulnerabilities to address first
Essential guide to Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures