CVE-2026-49077
Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere vulnerability in Tips and Tricks HQ WP eMember allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. This issue affects WP eMember: from n/a through v10.2.2.
Vulnerability Summary
CVSS v3 Score
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score (Exploitation Probability)
This vulnerability has a 0.03% probability of being exploited in the next 30 days, ranking higher than 8% of all scored CVEs.
CWE Classification
Related Vulnerabilities
Same Weakness Type(CWE-497)
IBM Aspera Faspex 5 5.0.0 through 5.0.14.1 could allow authenticated users to enumerate sensitive information of data due by enumerating package identifiers.
Nagios XI versions prior to 2024R1.1.3, under certain circumstances, disclose the server's Active Directory (AD) or LDAP authentication token to an authenticated user. Exposure of the server’s AD/LDAP token could allow domain-wide authentication misuse, escalation of privileges, or further compromise of network-integrated systems.
SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform allows an unauthenticated attacker to perform session hijacking over the network without any user interaction, due to an information disclosure vulnerability. Attacker can access and modify all the data of the application.
Synapse is an open-source Matrix homeserver. The Sliding Sync feature on Synapse versions between 1.113.0rc1 and 1.120.0 can leak partial room state changes to users no longer in a room. Non-state events, like messages, are unaffected. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.120.1.
Similar SeverityMEDIUM
A vulnerability was detected in keystonejs keystone up to 20260319. This vulnerability affects unknown code in the library packages/core/src/lib/core/queries/output-field.ts of the component GraphQL API Endpoint. The manipulation results in resource consumption. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
HCL iControl was affected by Weak Input Validation vulnerability. This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic. Received input that is expected to be of a certain type, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input is actually of the expected type.
Out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Samsung Open Source rlottie allows Overflow Buffers. This issue affects rlottie: before dcfde72eae1b0464dc0dd760aec00ada6a148635.
OP-TEE is a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) designed as companion to a non-secure Linux kernel running on Arm; Cortex-A cores using the TrustZone technology. Starting in version 4.3.0 and prior to version 4.11.0, a type confusion vulnerability exists in OP-TEE OS when processing an FFA_MEM_SHARE request from the normal world. This only applies when OP-TEE is configured as an SPMC for S-EL0 SPs, that is, with `CFG_CORE_SEL1_SPMC=y` and `CFG_SECURE_PARTITION=y`. Version 4.11.0 fixes the issue.
OP-TEE is a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) designed as companion to a non-secure Linux kernel running on Arm; Cortex-A cores using the TrustZone technology. Prior to version 4.11.0, on many of the ECDH shared secret paths, the public key isn't verified to be a point on the correct curve. By passing approximately 30-40 crafted public keys to OP-TEE, the private key can be reconstructed by a normal world attacker. When calling TEE_DeriveKey the public key is provided with full X and Y values, but the (X, Y) point might not satisfy the `Y^2 == X^3 + aX + b mod P` math for the specific curve that is used. When those public keys aren't rejected, the attacker can select public keys such that each DeriveKey call will leak `d % r` where `d` is the private key and `r` comes from the relationship between the correct curve and the attacker selected curve. With enough leaked data the Chinese remainder theorem can be used to recover the full private key. Version 4.11.0 fixes the issue.
Learn More
View this score breakdown or calculate a custom score
Learn how severity scores are calculated and what they mean
Best practices for deciding which vulnerabilities to address first
Essential guide to Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures