CVE-2025-3756
A vulnerability exists in the command handling of the IEC 61850 communication stack included in the product revisions listed as affected in this CVE. An attacker with access to IEC 61850 networks could exploit the vulnera bility by using a specially crafted 61850 packet, forcing the communication interfaces of the PM 877, CI850 and CI868 modules into fault mode or causing unavailability of the S+ Operations 61850 connectivity, resulting in a denial-of-service situation. The System 800xA IEC61850 Connect is not affected. Note: This vulnerability does not impact on the overall availability and functionality of the S+ Operations node, only the 61850 communication function. This issue affects AC800M (System 800xA): from 6.0.0x through 6.0.0303.0, from 6.1.0x through 6.1.0031.0, from 6.1.1x through 6.1.1004.0, from 6.1.1x through 6.1.1202.0, from 6.2.0x through 6.2.0006.0; Symphony Plus SD Series: A_0, A_1, A_2.003, A_3.005, A_4.001, B_0.005; Symphony Plus MR (Melody Rack): from 3.10 through 3.52; S+ Operations: 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.3.
Vulnerability Summary
CVSS v3 Score
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score (Exploitation Probability)
This vulnerability has a 0.03% probability of being exploited in the next 30 days, ranking higher than 8% of all scored CVEs.
CWE Classification
Related Vulnerabilities
Same Weakness Type(CWE-1284)
Sysax Multi Server 6.95 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the administrative password field that allows attackers to crash the application. Attackers can overwrite the password field with 800 bytes of repeated characters to trigger an application crash and disrupt server functionality.
In KDE Krita before 5.2.13, loading a manipulated TGA file could result in a heap-based buffer overflow in plugins/impex/tga/kis_tga_import.cpp (aka KisTgaImport). Control flow proceeds even when a number of pixels becomes negative.
N-central < 2025.4 can generate sessionIDs for unauthenticated users This issue affects N-central: before 2025.4.
In LibRaw before 0.21.4, tag 0x412 processing in phase_one_correct in decoders/load_mfbacks.cpp does not enforce minimum w0 and w1 values.
Insufficient data validation in Mojo in Google Chrome prior to 129.0.6668.89 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to perform an out of bounds memory write via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Similar SeverityMEDIUM
A vulnerability was detected in keystonejs keystone up to 20260319. This vulnerability affects unknown code in the library packages/core/src/lib/core/queries/output-field.ts of the component GraphQL API Endpoint. The manipulation results in resource consumption. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
HCL iControl was affected by Weak Input Validation vulnerability. This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic. Received input that is expected to be of a certain type, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input is actually of the expected type.
Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere vulnerability in Tips and Tricks HQ WP eMember allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. This issue affects WP eMember: from n/a through v10.2.2.
Out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Samsung Open Source rlottie allows Overflow Buffers. This issue affects rlottie: before dcfde72eae1b0464dc0dd760aec00ada6a148635.
OP-TEE is a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) designed as companion to a non-secure Linux kernel running on Arm; Cortex-A cores using the TrustZone technology. Starting in version 4.3.0 and prior to version 4.11.0, a type confusion vulnerability exists in OP-TEE OS when processing an FFA_MEM_SHARE request from the normal world. This only applies when OP-TEE is configured as an SPMC for S-EL0 SPs, that is, with `CFG_CORE_SEL1_SPMC=y` and `CFG_SECURE_PARTITION=y`. Version 4.11.0 fixes the issue.
Learn More
View this score breakdown or calculate a custom score
Learn how severity scores are calculated and what they mean
Best practices for deciding which vulnerabilities to address first
Essential guide to Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures